In a move that has shocked political observers and constitutional experts alike, India’s Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has submitted his resignation citing health reasons. As the second-highest constitutional authority in the country, Dhankhar’s abrupt exit has sparked a wave of speculation, raising questions about internal political dynamics and the future of the Vice President’s office.
The Role of the Vice President and Dhankhar’s Tenure
The Vice President of India plays a dual role—serving as the second citizen of the nation and as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of Parliament. Jagdeep Dhankhar, a seasoned politician and lawyer, assumed the post in 2022, bringing with him a firm, often outspoken style that made his tenure highly visible.
During his time in office, Dhankhar was known for assertive parliamentary interventions, strong stands on constitutional principles, and active engagement in Rajya Sabha proceedings. His legal background gave him the edge in handling complex debates, especially those involving the judiciary and executive. His emphasis on upholding constitutional morality, discipline in the house, and robust checks and balances drew both praise and criticism.
Health Reasons or Political Pressure?
Dhankhar cited prolonged health complications and the need for medical rest as the official reason for stepping down. However, this comes just ten days after he publicly stated his commitment to serve the entire five-year term till 2027, asserting he had no plans to step away early. This sudden U-turn has fueled widespread speculation about possible political pressure or internal conflict.
Some political analysts point toward recent instances of tension between Dhankhar and the ruling party’s stance on judicial independence and legislative oversight. His vocal criticism of judicial overreach, and simultaneous calls for stronger parliamentary integrity, may have placed him at odds with key power centers.
The Political and Constitutional Impact
His resignation leaves a crucial constitutional vacuum. With general elections approaching, the Vice President’s role in maintaining parliamentary discipline and procedural order becomes even more significant. Replacing a figure like Dhankhar, who balanced assertiveness with constitutional clarity, will not be easy.
The selection of the next Vice President will also signal how the ruling government plans to navigate growing scrutiny over executive accountability, judicial checks, and the role of opposition in a polarized political environment.
Moreover, the development comes at a time when debates on separation of powers, judicial reforms, and democratic institutions are already dominating national discourse. Dhankhar’s exit adds a new layer of complexity to this evolving narrative.
Conclusion
Jagdeep Dhankhar’s resignation marks a turning point in India’s political and constitutional landscape. While the official explanation attributes it to health reasons, the timing, political backdrop, and public contradictions suggest a more nuanced story.
In the coming days, all eyes will be on Rashtrapati Bhavan as a new Vice President is nominated. But beyond the appointment, India will have to reflect on the deeper implications this resignation holds for the balance of power, constitutional integrity, and the future of parliamentary democracy in the world’s largest democracy.
